Thursday, March 27, 2008

Tactile Keys for the iPhone At Last! [Technology]

I always had my reservations about the touch screen because of this very thing...
~P~
Tactile Keys for the iPhone At Last!

Tactile Keys for the iPhone At Last!

by Ben Arnold, March 26, 2008

Perhaps the one complaint that both detractors and proponents of the iPhone voice, is how difficult the device can be to type on sans any physical keys. Using the touch screen to type out any serious message takes some time to get used to. For instance, I found that my fingers had a propensity to hit more than one key at a time while trying to type on the iPhone. The problem was even worse than on my Treo.

My Touch Keys: The company website says that the actual product isn't blue - but clear.My Touch Keys: The company website says that the actual product isn't blue - but clear.


The solution for people like me may have arrived. Introducing My Touch Keys! My Touch Keys is a plastic shield that attaches to the front of your iPhone using static cling. The iPhone's touch screen QWERTY keyboard keys are then outlined in plastic "dimples" - allowing you to feel exactly where your fingers should be.

My Touch Keys attaches through static cling, this is good and allows for two things, the first being that the glass surface of your iPhone remains un-scarred by sticky adhesives nor is it scratched by physical plastic gripping the phone; the second is that My Touch Keys are completely transparent. How transparent you ask? Transparent enough for the company to claim that they won't interfere with your movie watching experience should you flip the phone and watch a movie in wide screen with the My Touch Keys guard still attached.

So will My Touch Keys improve your typing on the iPhone? Well, for only $7.99 for two, you don't have much to lose by giving them a shot.

Via OhGizmo!


Ben Arnold
Technocentric
InventorSpot.com

7 Ills That Don’t Need Pills [Health]

Interesting to know
~P~
7 Ills That Don't Need Pills

7 Ills That Don't Need Pills

In the April 2008 issue of the Harvard Health Letter, researchers explained how seven common conditions can be managed without medication. In many cases, the nonpharmacological approach can do as much or more than pills.

Arthritis: Combine weight loss with exercise, and you may have less pain and more mobility -- especially if the exercise that doesn't put any load on the joints, such as swimming, reduces pain.

Cholesterol: Adding soluble fiber to your diet can reduce levels of LDL cholesterol.

Cognitive decline: Memory training can help you stay sharp, and physical exercise can do even more.

Depression: Regular physical activity has a potent antidepressant effect.

Diabetes: Exercise makes muscle more receptive to the insulin, and eating fewer sweets and simple carbohydrates helps control blood sugar levels.

High blood pressure: Lose weight, get more exercise, and eat less sodium.

Osteoporosis: Weight-bearing exercise causes bone tissue to get stronger and denser. Extra vitamin D and calcium are key for your diet.

Sources:

Brain-damaged woman at center of Wal-Mart suit - CNN.com - Sent Using Google Toolbar

Leave it to Wal-Mart...
~P~
Brain-damaged woman at center of Wal-Mart suit - CNN.com

Brain-damaged woman at center of Wal-Mart suit

  • Story Highlights
  • Debbie Shank, 52, suffered severe brain damage in a traffic accident
  • Wal-Mart's health plan sued Shank and her family to recoup what it paid out
  • The Shanks got money in suit; Wal-Mart says policy means couple can't get benefits
  • Couple's son was killed in Iraq after they lost lawsuit to Wal-Mart
  • Next Article in U.S. »
By Randi Kaye
CNN
Decrease font Decrease font
Enlarge font Enlarge font

JACKSON, Missouri (CNN) -- Debbie Shank breaks down in tears every time she's told that her 18-year-old son, Jeremy, was killed in Iraq.

Debbie Shank

Debbie Shank, 52, has severe brain damage after a traffic accident in May 2000.

Click to view previous image
1 of 3
Click to view next image

The 52-year-old mother of three attended her son's funeral, but she continues to ask how he's doing. When her family reminds her that he's dead, she weeps as if hearing the news for the first time.

Shank suffered severe brain damage after a traffic accident nearly eight years ago that robbed her of much of her short-term memory and left her in a wheelchair and living in a nursing home.

It was the beginning of a series of battles -- both personal and legal -- that loomed for Shank and her family. One of their biggest was with Wal-Mart's health plan.

Eight years ago, Shank was stocking shelves for the retail giant and signed up for Wal-Mart's health and benefits plan.

Two years after the accident, Shank and her husband, Jim, were awarded about $1 million in a lawsuit against the trucking company involved in the crash. After legal fees were paid, $417,000 was placed in a trust to pay for Debbie Shank's long-term care.

Wal-Mart had paid out about $470,000 for Shank's medical expenses and later sued for the same amount. However, the court ruled it can only recoup what is left in the family's trust.

The Shanks didn't notice in the fine print of Wal-Mart's health plan policy that the company has the right to recoup medical expenses if an employee collects damages in a lawsuit.

Don't Miss

The family's attorney, Maurice Graham, said he informed Wal-Mart about the settlement and believed the Shanks would be allowed to keep the money. Video Watch this couple's story »

"We assumed after three years, they [Wal-Mart] had made a decision to let Debbie Shank use this money for what it was intended to," Graham said.

The Shanks lost their suit to Wal-Mart. Last summer, the couple appealed the ruling -- but also lost it. One week later, their son was killed in Iraq.

"They are quite within their rights. But I just wonder if they need it that bad," Jim Shank said.

In 2007, the retail giant reported net sales in the third quarter of $90 billion.

Legal or not, CNN asked Wal-Mart why the company pursued the money.

Wal-Mart spokesman John Simley, who called Debbie Shank's case "unbelievably sad," replied in a statement: "Wal-Mart's plan is bound by very specific rules. ... We wish it could be more flexible in Mrs. Shank's case since her circumstances are clearly extraordinary, but this is done out of fairness to all associates who contribute to, and benefit from, the plan."

Jim Shank said he believes Wal-Mart should make an exception.

"My idea of a win-win is -- you keep the paperwork that says you won and let us keep the money so I can take care of my wife," he said.

The family's situation is so dire that last year Jim Shank divorced Debbie, so she could receive more money from Medicaid.

Jim Shank, 54, is recovering from prostate cancer, works two jobs and struggles to pay the bills. He's afraid he won't be able to send their youngest son to college and pay for his and Debbie's care.

"Who needs the money more? A disabled lady in a wheelchair with no future, whatsoever, or does Wal-Mart need $90 billion, plus $200,000?" he asked.

The family's attorney agrees.

"The recovery that Debbie Shank made was recovery for future lost earnings, for her pain and suffering," Graham said.

"She'll never be able to work again. Never have a relationship with her husband or children again. The damage she recovered was for much more than just medical expenses."

Graham said he believes Wal-Mart should be entitled to only about $100,000. Right now, about $277,000 remains in the trust -- far short of the $470,000 Wal-Mart wants back.

Refusing to give up the fight, the Shanks appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. But just last week, the high court said it would not hear the case.

Graham said the Shanks have exhausted all their resources and there's nothing more they can do but go on with their lives.

advertisement

Jim Shank said he's disappointed with the Supreme Court's decision not to hear the case -- not for the sake of his family -- but for those who might face similar circumstances.

For now, he said the family will figure out a way to get by and "do the best we can for Debbie."

"Luckily, she's oblivious to everything," he said. "We don't tell her
what's going on because it will just upset her." E-mail to a friend E-mail to a friend